Winding number version of Cauchy integral formula: Difference between revisions
(New page: ==Statement== Suppose <math>U</math> is an open subset of <math>\mathbb{C}</math> and <math>f:U \to \mathbb{C}</math> is a holomorphic function. Suppose <math>c</math> is a sum of or...) |
(→Proof) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Now define an open subset: | Now define an open subset: | ||
<math>V := \{ z \in \C \setminus c \mid n(c;z) = 0 \}</math> | <math>V := \{ z \in \mathbb{C} \setminus c \mid n(c;z) = 0 \}</math> | ||
Then <math>U \cup V = \mathbb{C}</math>, and <math>V</math> is an open subset. Consider the function <math>g_1, g_2:U, V \to \mathbb{C}</math>: | Then <math>U \cup V = \mathbb{C}</math>, and <math>V</math> is an open subset. Consider the function <math>g_1, g_2:U, V \to \mathbb{C}</math>: |
Revision as of 14:25, 19 April 2008
Statement
Suppose is an open subset of and is a holomorphic function.
Suppose is a sum of oriented piecewise smooth loops , each completely inside . In other words, when we use the symbol , we actually mean .
Denote by the sum of the winding numbers of the about . Suppose is zero-homologous, i.e. for . Then we have, for any :
Proof
The idea here is to define analytic functions on two open subsets, show that they agree on the overlap, and hence obtain an analytic function on the whole of .
Define first:
if , if
Observe that is analytic in each variable. To see this, note that for fixed , is analytic in for away from , and the power series shows that it is analytic in a neighborhood of .
Now define an open subset:
Then , and is an open subset. Consider the function :
and:
To see that and agree on the intersection, observe that on the intersection , the difference is given by:
which is zero for points in the intersection, as they are points in about which the winding number is zero.