Winding number version of Cauchy integral formula: Difference between revisions

From Companal
(New page: ==Statement== Suppose <math>U</math> is an open subset of <math>\mathbb{C}</math> and <math>f:U \to \mathbb{C}</math> is a holomorphic function. Suppose <math>c</math> is a sum of or...)
 
Line 21: Line 21:
Now define an open subset:
Now define an open subset:


<math>V := \{ z \in \C \setminus c \mid n(c;z) = 0 \}</math>
<math>V := \{ z \in \mathbb{C} \setminus c \mid n(c;z) = 0 \}</math>


Then <math>U \cup V = \mathbb{C}</math>, and <math>V</math> is an open subset. Consider the function <math>g_1, g_2:U, V \to \mathbb{C}</math>:
Then <math>U \cup V = \mathbb{C}</math>, and <math>V</math> is an open subset. Consider the function <math>g_1, g_2:U, V \to \mathbb{C}</math>:

Revision as of 14:25, 19 April 2008

Statement

Suppose is an open subset of and is a holomorphic function.

Suppose is a sum of oriented piecewise smooth loops , each completely inside . In other words, when we use the symbol , we actually mean .

Denote by the sum of the winding numbers of the about . Suppose is zero-homologous, i.e. for . Then we have, for any :

Proof

The idea here is to define analytic functions on two open subsets, show that they agree on the overlap, and hence obtain an analytic function on the whole of .

Define first:

if , if

Observe that is analytic in each variable. To see this, note that for fixed , is analytic in for away from , and the power series shows that it is analytic in a neighborhood of .

Now define an open subset:

Then , and is an open subset. Consider the function :

and:

To see that and agree on the intersection, observe that on the intersection , the difference is given by:

which is zero for points in the intersection, as they are points in about which the winding number is zero.