Residue theorem: Difference between revisions

From Companal
(New page: ==Statement== Suppose <math>U</math> is an open subset of <math>\mathbb{C}</math>. Let <math>z_1, z_2, \ldots, z_r</math> be points in <math>U</math> and <math>f:U \setminus \{ z_j\}_{1 \...)
 
Line 9: Line 9:
==Related facts==
==Related facts==


* [[Winding number version of Cauchy integral formula]] is a special case of this, where the function has precisely one pole of order one.
* [[Winding number version of Cauchy integral formula]] is a special case of this, where the function has precisely one pole of order one. However, we typically ''use'' the winding number version of Cauchy integral formula to establish the residue theorem.

Revision as of 15:00, 19 April 2008

Statement

Suppose U is an open subset of C. Let z1,z2,,zr be points in U and f:U{zj}1jrC be a holomorphic function. Let c be a 0-homologous sum of loops in U{zj}1jr such that c is zero-homologous. Then, we have:

cf(z)dz=j=1rn(c;zj)res(f;zj)

The residue res here denotes the coefficient of 1/(zzj) in the laurent expansion about zj.

Related facts

  • Winding number version of Cauchy integral formula is a special case of this, where the function has precisely one pole of order one. However, we typically use the winding number version of Cauchy integral formula to establish the residue theorem.