Reflection relation for gamma function: Difference between revisions

From Companal
(New page: ==Statement== Let <math>\Gamma</math> denote the gamma function. Then, for any <math>z</math> that is not an integer, we have: <math>\Gamma(z)\Gamma(1-z) = \frac{\pi}{\sin (\pi z)}</...)
 
Line 8: Line 8:


* [[Recurrence relation for gamma function]]: This shows that it suffices to prove the result for <math>\operatorname{Re}(z) \in (0,1)</math>
* [[Recurrence relation for gamma function]]: This shows that it suffices to prove the result for <math>\operatorname{Re}(z) \in (0,1)</math>
* The following identity, for <math>0 < \operatorname{Re}(a) < 1</math>:
<math>\int_0^1 \frac{v^{a-1}}{1 + v} = \frac{\pi{\sin \pi z}</math>
==Proof==
===Proof of the integration identity===
Pick a branch of the logarithm that is slit along the positive real axis, and thus rewrite:
<math>v^{a - 1} = e^{(a - 1)\log v}</math>
Where the branch of logarithm is chosen so that the approach to the positive real axis from the upper half-plane side is the usual logarithm.
Next, apply the [[keyhole contour integration method]] to compute this integral. The inner and outer circle integrals approach zero, and if we define:
<math>I ::= \int_0^1 \frac{v^{a-1}}{1 + v}</math>
Then, we'll obtain:
<math>I(e^{2\pi i (a - 1)} - 1) = 2\pi i \operatorname{res}(\frac{e^{(a - 1)\log v}}{1 + v}; -1)</math>
The residue at <math>-1</math> is simple <math>e^{\pi i (a - 1)}</math> and simplifying the expression, we obtain the required expression for <math>I</math>.
===Proving the result using the integration identity===

Revision as of 19:08, 1 May 2008

Statement

Let denote the gamma function. Then, for any that is not an integer, we have:

Facts used

  • Recurrence relation for gamma function: This shows that it suffices to prove the result for
  • The following identity, for :

Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \int_0^1 \frac{v^{a-1}}{1 + v} = \frac{\pi{\sin \pi z}}

Proof

Proof of the integration identity

Pick a branch of the logarithm that is slit along the positive real axis, and thus rewrite:

Where the branch of logarithm is chosen so that the approach to the positive real axis from the upper half-plane side is the usual logarithm.

Next, apply the keyhole contour integration method to compute this integral. The inner and outer circle integrals approach zero, and if we define:

Then, we'll obtain:

The residue at is simple and simplifying the expression, we obtain the required expression for .

Proving the result using the integration identity