Holomorphic implies complex-analytic: Difference between revisions
(New page: {{definition equivalence|holomorphic function}} ==Statement== Suppose <math>U</math> is a domain in <math>\mathbb{C}</math>, and <math>f: U \to \mathbb{C}</math> is holomorphic: it i...) |
m (1 revision) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 19:13, 18 May 2008
This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term holomorphic function
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions
Statement
Suppose is a domain in , and is holomorphic: it is complex-differentiable, and its differential is a continuous function. Then, is a complex-analytic function: for every point in , we can find a disc about that point, and a power series that agrees with on that disc.
In fact, something stronger is true: given any point and any disc of radius about contained completely inside , we can find a power series that converges on that disc, and agrees with on the disc. In other words, we can make the radius of convergence of the power series as large as we can make a disc completely contained inside the open subset.
Definitions used
Facts used
Cauchy integral formula
- Further information: Cauchy integral formula
We use here the version for a circle and its center. The general version, involving winding numbers, is not necessary for this proof.
Converse
The converse is also true.
- Further information: Complex-analytic implies holomorphic
Proof
Fill this in later