Holomorphic implies complex-analytic: Difference between revisions

From Companal
(New page: {{definition equivalence|holomorphic function}} ==Statement== Suppose <math>U</math> is a domain in <math>\mathbb{C}</math>, and <math>f: U \to \mathbb{C}</math> is holomorphic: it i...)
 
m (1 revision)
(No difference)

Revision as of 19:13, 18 May 2008

This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term holomorphic function


View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions

Statement

Suppose U is a domain in C, and f:UC is holomorphic: it is complex-differentiable, and its differential is a continuous function. Then, f is a complex-analytic function: for every point in U, we can find a disc about that point, and a power series that agrees with f on that disc.

In fact, something stronger is true: given any point z0U and any disc of radius r about z0 contained completely inside U, we can find a power series that converges on that disc, and agrees with f on the disc. In other words, we can make the radius of convergence of the power series as large as we can make a disc completely contained inside the open subset.

Definitions used

Facts used

Cauchy integral formula

Further information: Cauchy integral formula

We use here the version for a circle and its center. The general version, involving winding numbers, is not necessary for this proof.

Converse

The converse is also true.

Further information: Complex-analytic implies holomorphic

Proof

Fill this in later