Holomorphic implies complex-analytic: Difference between revisions

From Companal
(New page: {{definition equivalence|holomorphic function}} ==Statement== Suppose <math>U</math> is a domain in <math>\mathbb{C}</math>, and <math>f: U \to \mathbb{C}</math> is holomorphic: it i...)
 
m (1 revision)
(No difference)

Revision as of 19:13, 18 May 2008

This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term holomorphic function


View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions

Statement

Suppose is a domain in , and is holomorphic: it is complex-differentiable, and its differential is a continuous function. Then, is a complex-analytic function: for every point in , we can find a disc about that point, and a power series that agrees with on that disc.

In fact, something stronger is true: given any point and any disc of radius about contained completely inside , we can find a power series that converges on that disc, and agrees with on the disc. In other words, we can make the radius of convergence of the power series as large as we can make a disc completely contained inside the open subset.

Definitions used

Facts used

Cauchy integral formula

Further information: Cauchy integral formula

We use here the version for a circle and its center. The general version, involving winding numbers, is not necessary for this proof.

Converse

The converse is also true.

Further information: Complex-analytic implies holomorphic

Proof

Fill this in later