Goursat's integral lemma: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Goursat's lemma moved to Goursat's integral lemma) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 20:54, 19 April 2008
Statement
For a triangle
Suppose is a domain in , and is a holomorphic function. Suppose is a triangle contained completely inside (i.e. the interior and boundary are contained inside ). Then, we have:
For a region bounded by piecewise smooth curves
Suppose is a domain in , and is a holomorphic function. Suppose is an open subset whose closure is a compact subset of , such that is piecewise . Note that may have disconnected boundary; for instance, may be an annulus.
Then we have:
Note that this is a slight generalization of the previous case, where we restrict to the interior of a triangle.
Statement in terms of cohomology and loops
Note that integration along piecewise smooth curves gives a map as follows:
Piecewise smooth curves Continuous functions
We can restrict attention to piecewise smooth loops at a point . What this says is that if the loop is nullhomologous, or if we take a sum of loops whose homology classes add up to zero, then evaluating on any holomorphic function, gives the value zero.
This helps us tells us that the map we have descends to a bilinear map: