Biholomorphically equivalent domains: Difference between revisions

From Companal
(New page: ==Definition== Let <math>U,V \subset \mathbb{C}^n</math> be domains (open connected subset). We say that <math>U,V</math> are '''biholomorphically equivalent''' if there exists a [[h...)
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Let <math>U,V \subset \mathbb{C}^n</math> be [[domain]]s (open connected subset). We say that <math>U,V</math> are '''biholomorphically equivalent''' if there exists a  [[holomorphic function]] <math>\varphi:U \to V</math> with a holomorphic inverse <math>\varphi^{-1}:V \to U</math>.
Let <math>U,V \subset \mathbb{C}^n</math> be [[domain]]s (open connected subset). We say that <math>U,V</math> are '''biholomorphically equivalent''' if there exists a  [[holomorphic function]] <math>\varphi:U \to V</math> with a holomorphic inverse <math>\varphi^{-1}:V \to U</math>.


(By a holomorphic function from <math>U</math> to <math>V</math>, we mean a holomorphic function from <math>U</math> to <math>\C^n</math>, whose image lies completely inside <math>V</math>. In this case, we get a bijection from <math>U</math> to <math>V</math> that is holomorphic both ways.
(By a holomorphic function from <math>U</math> to <math>V</math>, we mean a holomorphic function from <math>U</math> to <math>\mathbb{C}^n</math>, whose image lies completely inside <math>V</math>. In this case, we get a bijection from <math>U</math> to <math>V</math> that is holomorphic both ways.

Revision as of 18:26, 16 April 2008

Definition

Let U,VCn be domains (open connected subset). We say that U,V are biholomorphically equivalent if there exists a holomorphic function φ:UV with a holomorphic inverse φ1:VU.

(By a holomorphic function from U to V, we mean a holomorphic function from U to Cn, whose image lies completely inside V. In this case, we get a bijection from U to V that is holomorphic both ways.