Argument principle: Difference between revisions

From Companal
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
<math>n(f \circ c; 0) = \sum ord(z_j)n(c;z_j)</math>
<math>n(f \circ c; 0) = \sum ord(z_j)n(c;z_j)</math>


Where the sum is taken over all zeros/poles <math>z_j</math> for <math>f</math> and <math>ord(z_j)</math> is the [[order of zero for function at point|order]] of <math>f</math> at </math>z_j</math>: the unique integer <math>n</math> such that <math>(z - z_j)^{-n}f(z)</math> has neither a zero nor a pole at <math>z_j</math>.
Where the sum is taken over all zeros/poles <math>z_j</math> for <math>f</math> and <math>ord(z_j)</math> is the [[order of zero for function at point|order]] of <math>f</math> at <math>z_j</math>: the unique integer <math>n</math> such that <math>(z - z_j)^{-n}f(z)</math> has neither a zero nor a pole at <math>z_j</math>.


Equivalently, we can write this as:
Equivalently, we can write this as:
Line 14: Line 14:


where the first summation is for zeros, counted with multiplicity, and the second summation is for poles, counted with multiplicity.
where the first summation is for zeros, counted with multiplicity, and the second summation is for poles, counted with multiplicity.
==Facts used==
* [[Residue theorem]]
* [[Order of zero equals residue of logarithmic derivative]]

Revision as of 22:36, 26 April 2008

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in complex analysis.
View a complete list of basic facts in complex analysis

This fact is an application of the following pivotal fact/result/idea: residue theorem
View other applications of residue theorem OR Read a survey article on applying residue theorem

Statement

Suppose is an open subset and is a 0-homologous cycle in . Suppose is a meromorphic function on such that no zero or pole of lies in . Then we have:

Where the sum is taken over all zeros/poles for and is the order of at : the unique integer such that has neither a zero nor a pole at .

Equivalently, we can write this as:

where the first summation is for zeros, counted with multiplicity, and the second summation is for poles, counted with multiplicity.

Facts used