Winding number version of Cauchy integral formula: Difference between revisions
(→Proof) |
(→Proof) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Then <math>U \cup V = \mathbb{C}</math>, and <math>V</math> is an open subset. Consider the function <math>g_1, g_2:U, V \to \mathbb{C}</math>: | Then <math>U \cup V = \mathbb{C}</math>, and <math>V</math> is an open subset. Consider the function <math>g_1, g_2:U, V \to \mathbb{C}</math>: | ||
<math>g_1(z) := \oint_c \varphi(z,w) \, | <math>g_1(z) := \oint_c \varphi(z,w) \, dw</math> | ||
and: | and: | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
which is zero for points in the intersection, as they are points in <math>U</math> about which the winding number is zero. | which is zero for points in the intersection, as they are points in <math>U</math> about which the winding number is zero. | ||
Thus, we can paste them together to get a single holomorphic function <math>g: \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}</math>. It is clear from the expression that <math>g(z) \to 0</math> as <math>|z| \to \infty</math>; hence, using the fact that [[bounded and entire implies constant|any bounded entire function is constant]], we obtain that <math>g \equiv 0</math>. This shows that: | |||
<math>\oint_c \frac{f(z)}{z - w} \, dw = \oint_c \frac{f(w)}{z - w} \, dw</math> | |||
The left side evaluates to <math>n(c;z)f(z)</math>: precisely what we want. |
Revision as of 14:31, 19 April 2008
Statement
Suppose is an open subset of and is a holomorphic function.
Suppose is a sum of oriented piecewise smooth loops , each completely inside . In other words, when we use the symbol , we actually mean .
Denote by the sum of the winding numbers of the about . Suppose is zero-homologous, i.e. for . Then we have, for any :
Proof
The idea here is to define analytic functions on two open subsets, show that they agree on the overlap, and hence obtain an analytic function on the whole of .
Define first:
if , if
Observe that is analytic in each variable. To see this, note that for fixed , is analytic in for away from , and the power series shows that it is analytic in a neighborhood of .
Now define an open subset:
Then , and is an open subset. Consider the function :
and:
To see that and agree on the intersection, observe that on the intersection , the difference is given by:
which is zero for points in the intersection, as they are points in about which the winding number is zero.
Thus, we can paste them together to get a single holomorphic function . It is clear from the expression that as ; hence, using the fact that any bounded entire function is constant, we obtain that . This shows that:
The left side evaluates to : precisely what we want.