Winding number version of Cauchy integral formula: Difference between revisions

From Companal
Line 25: Line 25:
Then <math>U \cup V = \mathbb{C}</math>, and <math>V</math> is an open subset. Consider the function <math>g_1, g_2:U, V \to \mathbb{C}</math>:
Then <math>U \cup V = \mathbb{C}</math>, and <math>V</math> is an open subset. Consider the function <math>g_1, g_2:U, V \to \mathbb{C}</math>:


<math>g_1(z) := \oint_c \varphi(z,w) \, dz</math>
<math>g_1(z) := \oint_c \varphi(z,w) \, dw</math>


and:
and:
Line 36: Line 36:


which is zero for points in the intersection, as they are points in <math>U</math> about which the winding number is zero.
which is zero for points in the intersection, as they are points in <math>U</math> about which the winding number is zero.
Thus, we can paste them together to get a single holomorphic function <math>g: \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}</math>. It is clear from the expression that <math>g(z) \to 0</math> as <math>|z| \to \infty</math>; hence, using the fact that [[bounded and entire implies constant|any bounded entire function is constant]], we obtain that <math>g \equiv 0</math>. This shows that:
<math>\oint_c \frac{f(z)}{z - w} \, dw = \oint_c \frac{f(w)}{z - w} \, dw</math>
The left side evaluates to <math>n(c;z)f(z)</math>: precisely what we want.

Revision as of 14:31, 19 April 2008

Statement

Suppose U is an open subset of C and f:U→C is a holomorphic function.

Suppose c is a sum of oriented piecewise smooth loops c1,c2,…,cr, each completely inside U. In other words, when we use the symbol ∮cg(z)dz, we actually mean ∑1r∫crg(z)dz.

Denote by n(c;z0) the sum of the winding numbers of the ck about z0. Suppose c is zero-homologous, i.e. n(c;z)=0 for z∈C∖U. Then we have, for any z0∈U:

n(c;z0)f(z0)=12πi∮cf(z)z−z0dz

Proof

The idea here is to define analytic functions on two open subsets, show that they agree on the overlap, and hence obtain an analytic function on the whole of C.

Define first:

φ(z,w)=f(z)−f(w)z−w if z≠w, f′(z) if z=w

Observe that φ is analytic in each variable. To see this, note that for fixed z, φ is analytic in w for w away from z, and the power series shows that it is analytic in a neighborhood of z.

Now define an open subset:

V:={z∈C∖c∣n(c;z)=0}

Then U∪V=C, and V is an open subset. Consider the function g1,g2:U,V→C:

g1(z):=∮cφ(z,w)dw

and:

g2(z):=∮cf(w)w−zdw

To see that g1 and g2 agree on the intersection, observe that on the intersection U∩V, the difference is given by:

∮cf(z)z−wdz

which is zero for points in the intersection, as they are points in U about which the winding number is zero.

Thus, we can paste them together to get a single holomorphic function g:C→C. It is clear from the expression that g(z)→0 as |z|→∞; hence, using the fact that any bounded entire function is constant, we obtain that g≡0. This shows that:

∮cf(z)z−wdw=∮cf(w)z−wdw

The left side evaluates to n(c;z)f(z): precisely what we want.