Goursat's integral lemma for complex-differentiable functions: Difference between revisions

From Companal
(New page: ==Statement== Suppose <math>U \subset \mathbb{C}</math> is an open subset, and <math>f:U \to \mathbb{C}</math> is complex-differentiable at ...)
 
m (2 revisions)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{basic fact}}
==Statement==
==Statement==



Latest revision as of 19:13, 18 May 2008

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in complex analysis.
View a complete list of basic facts in complex analysis

Statement

Suppose U⊂C is an open subset, and f:U→C is complex-differentiable at every point. Suppose △ is a triangle lying completely inside U. Then, we have:

∫∂△f(z)dz=0

Proof

Define:

α(△)=∫∂△f(z)dz

Note that △ can be split into four congruent triangles by joining the midpoints of the sides. Since α(△) is the sum of α evaluated for each of the pieces, at least one of the pieces △1 must satisfy:

|α(△1)|≤|α(△)|

Pick this triangle, and again divide it into four triangles. Repeating this process we get a descending sequence of triangles, each having side-lengths half of its predecessor:

△⊃△1⊃△2⊃…

and with the further property that:

|α(△)|≤4n|α(△n)|

On the other hand, we have that:

L(∂△n)=12nL(∂△)

Now let c∈△ be the unique point in the intersection of all the △ns. Since f is differentiable at the point c, we have:

limz→cf(z)−f(c)z−c=0

Define now:

g(z):=f(z)−f(c)z−c−f′(c)

Then g(c)=0. Observe that:

∫∂△nf(c)dz=∫∂△nf′(c)(z−c)=0

Thus, we get:

α(△n)=∫∂△ng(z)(z−c)dz

Applying the length estimates and size estimates now gives the result. Fill this in later