Conformal automorphism of complex numbers implies affine map: Difference between revisions

From Companal
m (1 revision)
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
Now consider the singularity of <math>z</math> at <math>0</math>. The following possibilities arise.
Now consider the singularity of <math>z</math> at <math>0</math>. The following possibilities arise.


* The singularity is a [[removable singularity]]: In that case, it takes a finite complex value, and thus <math>g</math> is bounded in a small neighborhood of <math>0</math>. Thus, <math>f</math> is bounded outside a bounded subset, and since it is continuous, <math>f</math> is globally bounded. [[Lioville's theorem]] thus forces <math>f</math> to be constant
* The singularity is a [[removable singularity]]: In that case, it takes a finite complex value, and thus <math>g</math> is bounded in a small neighborhood of <math>0</math>. Thus, <math>f</math> is bounded outside a bounded subset, and since it is continuous, <math>f</math> is globally bounded. [[Liouville's theorem]] (fact (1)) thus forces <math>f</math> to be constant
* The singularity is an [[essential singularity]]: In that case, the Casorati-Weierstrass theorem tells us that the image under <math>g</math> of a small neighborhood of <math>0</math>, is dense in <math>\mathbb{C}</math>. This clearly shows that <math>f</math> isn't a homeomorphism (since it maps a non-dense set to a dense set) so it cannot be a conformal automorphism
* The singularity is an [[essential singularity]]: In that case, the Casorati-Weierstrass theorem tells us that the image under <math>g</math> of a small neighborhood of <math>0</math>, is dense in <math>\mathbb{C}</math>. This clearly shows that <math>f</math> isn't a homeomorphism (since it maps a non-dense set to a dense set) so it cannot be a conformal automorphism
* The singularity is a [[pole]]: Thus, we obtain:
* The singularity is a [[pole]]: Thus, we obtain:
Line 33: Line 33:
where <math>h</math> is a holomorphic function. But we also have a global power series for <math>f</math>, which must match up with the above, so we see that <math>f</math> is a polynomial of degree at most <math>n</math>. Thus, it remains to check which polynomial maps from <math>\mathbb{C}</math> to <math>\mathbb{C}</math> are conformal.
where <math>h</math> is a holomorphic function. But we also have a global power series for <math>f</math>, which must match up with the above, so we see that <math>f</math> is a polynomial of degree at most <math>n</math>. Thus, it remains to check which polynomial maps from <math>\mathbb{C}</math> to <math>\mathbb{C}</math> are conformal.


Suppose <math>f: \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}</math> is conformal and a [[polynomial map]]. Then, <math>f'</math> should vanish nowhere. But <math>f'</math> is also a polynomial map, and by the [[fundamental theorem of algebra]], <math>f'</math> must be constant. Thus, <math>f</math> must be a linear polynomial.
Suppose <math>f: \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}</math> is conformal and a [[polynomial map]]. Then, <math>f^'</math> should vanish nowhere. But <math>f^'</math> is also a polynomial map, and by the [[fundamental theorem of algebra]], <math>f^'</math> must be constant. Thus, <math>f</math> must be a linear polynomial.

Revision as of 19:47, 12 September 2008

This article describes the computation of the conformal automorphism group of a domain or a Riemann surface
View other such computations

Statement

Suppose is a conformal automorphism: in other words, is an entire function from to with entire inverse. Then, is of the form:

Facts used

Proof

Proof using Casorati-Weierstrass

Suppose is a conformal map. By composing with a translation, assume that . Then, consider the map given by:

Now consider the singularity of at . The following possibilities arise.

  • The singularity is a removable singularity: In that case, it takes a finite complex value, and thus is bounded in a small neighborhood of . Thus, is bounded outside a bounded subset, and since it is continuous, is globally bounded. Liouville's theorem (fact (1)) thus forces to be constant
  • The singularity is an essential singularity: In that case, the Casorati-Weierstrass theorem tells us that the image under of a small neighborhood of , is dense in . This clearly shows that isn't a homeomorphism (since it maps a non-dense set to a dense set) so it cannot be a conformal automorphism
  • The singularity is a pole: Thus, we obtain:

where is a holomorphic. Plugging back in terms of we obtain:

where is a holomorphic function. But we also have a global power series for , which must match up with the above, so we see that is a polynomial of degree at most . Thus, it remains to check which polynomial maps from to are conformal.

Suppose is conformal and a polynomial map. Then, should vanish nowhere. But is also a polynomial map, and by the fundamental theorem of algebra, must be constant. Thus, must be a linear polynomial.