Uniqueness theorem: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
===For Riemann surfaces=== | ===For Riemann surfaces=== | ||
{ | Suppose <math>M</math> is a [[Riemann surface]]. In other words, <math>M</math> is a connected surface with an atlas of coordinate charts having conformal transition maps. Then, if <math>f,g: M \to \mathbb{C}</math> are [[holomorphic function]]s, we either have <math>f \equiv g</math>, or the set of points where <math>f = g</math>, is a discrete closed subset. | ||
==Related facts== | ==Related facts== | ||
* [[Holomorphic function is determined by its germ]]: An easy corollary of the uniqueness theorem | * [[Holomorphic function is determined by its germ]]: An easy corollary of the uniqueness theorem |
Revision as of 21:57, 3 May 2008
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in complex analysis.
View a complete list of basic facts in complex analysis
Statement
For domains in the complex numbers
Suppose is a nonempty domain (open connected subset) of . Then, given two maps , exactly one of these two possibilities holds:
- on
- The set of points for which is a discrete closed subset (i.e. it has no limit points)
For Riemann surfaces
Suppose is a Riemann surface. In other words, is a connected surface with an atlas of coordinate charts having conformal transition maps. Then, if are holomorphic functions, we either have , or the set of points where , is a discrete closed subset.
Related facts
- Holomorphic function is determined by its germ: An easy corollary of the uniqueness theorem