Reflection relation for gamma function: Difference between revisions
m (5 revisions) |
|
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 19:17, 18 May 2008
Statement
Let denote the gamma function. Then, for any that is not an integer, we have:
Facts used
- Recurrence relation for gamma function: This shows that it suffices to prove the result for
- The following identity, for :
Proof
Proof of the integration identity
Pick a branch of the logarithm that is slit along the positive real axis, and thus rewrite:
Where the branch of logarithm is chosen so that the approach to the positive real axis from the upper half-plane side is the usual logarithm.
Next, apply the keyhole contour integration method to compute this integral. The inner and outer circle integrals approach zero, and if we define:
Then, we'll obtain:
The residue at is simple and simplifying the expression, we obtain the required expression for .