Homotopy-invariance formulation of Cauchy's theorem: Difference between revisions

From Companal
(New page: ==Statement== Suppose <math>U \subset \mathbb{C}</math> is an open subset and <math>c_1, c_2</math> are two cycles (cycle being a sum of smooth simple closed curves) that are smoothly hom...)
 
m (3 revisions)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{basic fact}}
==Statement==
==Statement==


Suppose <math>U \subset \mathbb{C}</math> is an open subset and <math>c_1, c_2</math> are two cycles (cycle being a sum of smooth simple closed curves) that are smoothly homotopic. Then, for any [[holomorphic function]] <math>f: U \to \mathbb{C}</math>, we have:
Suppose <math>U \subset \mathbb{C}</math> is an open subset and <math>\gamma_1,\gamma_2</math> are two smooth paths in <math>U</math> such that there is a smooth homotopy between <math>\gamma_1</math> and <math>\gamma_2</math> preserving endpoints. Then, for any [[holomorphic function]] <math>f: U \to \mathbb{C}</math>, we have:


<math>\oint_{c_1} f(z) dz = \oint_{c_2} f(z) dz</math>
<math>\oint_{\gamma_1} f(z) dz = \oint_{\gamma_2} f(z) dz</math>


In particular, if <math>c</math> is a zero-homologous cycle, we have <math>\oint_c f(z) dz = 0</math>.
In particular, if <math>c</math> is a zero-homologous cycle, we have <math>\oint_c f(z) dz = 0</math>.

Latest revision as of 19:13, 18 May 2008

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in complex analysis.
View a complete list of basic facts in complex analysis

Statement

Suppose is an open subset and are two smooth paths in such that there is a smooth homotopy between and preserving endpoints. Then, for any holomorphic function , we have:

In particular, if is a zero-homologous cycle, we have .

Related facts

  • Goursat's integral lemma: It states something very similar, albeit in a very special case: where forms the smooth boundary of a region.