Biholomorphically equivalent domains: Difference between revisions

From Companal
No edit summary
m (3 revisions)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


(By a holomorphic function from <math>U</math> to <math>V</math>, we mean a holomorphic function from <math>U</math> to <math>\mathbb{C}^n</math>, whose image lies completely inside <math>V</math>. In this case, we get a bijection from <math>U</math> to <math>V</math> that is holomorphic both ways.
(By a holomorphic function from <math>U</math> to <math>V</math>, we mean a holomorphic function from <math>U</math> to <math>\mathbb{C}^n</math>, whose image lies completely inside <math>V</math>. In this case, we get a bijection from <math>U</math> to <math>V</math> that is holomorphic both ways.
When <math>n=1</math>, biholomorphically equivalent domains are also termed '''conformally equivalent'''.
==Relation with other equivalence relations==
===Weaker equivalence relations===
* [[Diffeomorphic domains]]
* [[Homeomorphic domains]]
* [[Homotopy-equivalent domains]]
==Facts==
Any two simply connected open subsets of <math>\mathbb{C}</math> are biholomorphically equivalent. This is a consequence of the [[Riemann mapping theorem]].

Latest revision as of 19:10, 18 May 2008

Definition

Let be domains (open connected subset). We say that are biholomorphically equivalent if there exists a holomorphic function with a holomorphic inverse .

(By a holomorphic function from to , we mean a holomorphic function from to , whose image lies completely inside . In this case, we get a bijection from to that is holomorphic both ways.

When , biholomorphically equivalent domains are also termed conformally equivalent.

Relation with other equivalence relations

Weaker equivalence relations

Facts

Any two simply connected open subsets of are biholomorphically equivalent. This is a consequence of the Riemann mapping theorem.