Argument principle: Difference between revisions

From Companal
No edit summary
m (4 revisions)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 19:09, 18 May 2008

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in complex analysis.
View a complete list of basic facts in complex analysis

This fact is an application of the following pivotal fact/result/idea: residue theorem
View other applications of residue theorem OR Read a survey article on applying residue theorem

Statement

Suppose is an open subset and is a 0-homologous cycle in . Suppose is a meromorphic function on such that no zero or pole of lies in . Then we have:

Where the sum is taken over all zeros/poles for and is the order of at : the unique integer such that has neither a zero nor a pole at .

Equivalently, we can write this as:

where the first summation is for zeros, counted with multiplicity, and the second summation is for poles, counted with multiplicity.

Facts used