Argument principle: Difference between revisions
(New page: ==Statement== Suppose <math>U \subset \mathbb{C}</math> is an open subset and <math>c</math> is a 0-homologous cycle in <math>U</math>. Suppose <math>f</math> is a [[meromorphic function]...) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{basic fact}} | |||
{{application of|residue theorem}} | |||
==Statement== | ==Statement== | ||
Revision as of 19:30, 26 April 2008
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a basic fact in complex analysis.
View a complete list of basic facts in complex analysis
This fact is an application of the following pivotal fact/result/idea: residue theorem
View other applications of residue theorem OR Read a survey article on applying residue theorem
Statement
Suppose is an open subset and is a 0-homologous cycle in . Suppose is a meromorphic function on such that no zero or pole of lies in . Then we have:
Where the sum is taken over all zeros/poles for and is the unique integer such that has neither a zero nor a pole at .
Equivalently, we can write this as:
where the first summation is for zeros, counted with multiplicity, and the second summation is for poles, counted with multiplicity.